Source: Eurostat, Luxembourg
| Description | Direct Link | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Innovative enterprises (including enterprises with abandoned/ suspended or on-going innovation activities) / Enterprises that had procedures to identify and reduce the environmental impacts / Number / Sweden (Unit: NR) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Innovative enterprises (including enterprises with abandoned/ suspended or on-going innovation activities) / Enterprises that had procedures to identify and reduce the environmental impacts / Number / Serbia (Unit: NR) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Innovative enterprises (including enterprises with abandoned/ suspended or on-going innovation activities) / Enterprises that had procedures to identify and reduce the environmental impacts / Percentage / Serbia (Unit: PC) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Innovative enterprises (including enterprises with abandoned/ suspended or on-going innovation activities) / Enterprises that did not have procedures to identify and reduce the environmental impacts / Number / Sweden (Unit: NR) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Innovative enterprises (including enterprises with abandoned/ suspended or on-going innovation activities) / Enterprises that did not have procedures to identify and reduce the environmental impacts / Number / Serbia (Unit: NR) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Innovative enterprises (including enterprises with abandoned/ suspended or on-going innovation activities) / Enterprises that did not have procedures to identify and reduce the environmental impacts / Percentage / Serbia (Unit: PC) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Innovative enterprises (including enterprises with abandoned/ suspended or on-going innovation activities) / Enterprises that had procedures implemented before 2012 to identify and reduce the environmental impacts / Number / Sweden (Unit: NR) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Innovative enterprises (including enterprises with abandoned/ suspended or on-going innovation activities) / Enterprises that had procedures implemented before 2012 to identify and reduce the environmental impacts / Number / Serbia (Unit: NR) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Innovative enterprises (including enterprises with abandoned/ suspended or on-going innovation activities) / Enterprises that had procedures implemented before 2012 to identify and reduce the environmental impacts / Percentage / Serbia (Unit: PC) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Innovative enterprises (including enterprises with abandoned/ suspended or on-going innovation activities) / Enterprises that had procedures implemented between 2012 and 2014 to identify and reduce the environmental impacts / Number / Sweden (Unit: NR) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Innovative enterprises (including enterprises with abandoned/ suspended or on-going innovation activities) / Enterprises that had procedures implemented between 2012 and 2014 to identify and reduce the environmental impacts / Number / Serbia (Unit: NR) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Innovative enterprises (including enterprises with abandoned/ suspended or on-going innovation activities) / Enterprises that had procedures implemented between 2012 and 2014 to identify and reduce the environmental impacts / Percentage / Serbia (Unit: PC) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Non-innovative enterprises / Enterprises that had procedures to identify and reduce the environmental impacts / Number / Sweden (Unit: NR) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Non-innovative enterprises / Enterprises that had procedures to identify and reduce the environmental impacts / Number / Serbia (Unit: NR) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Non-innovative enterprises / Enterprises that had procedures to identify and reduce the environmental impacts / Percentage / Serbia (Unit: PC) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Non-innovative enterprises / Enterprises that did not have procedures to identify and reduce the environmental impacts / Number / Sweden (Unit: NR) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Non-innovative enterprises / Enterprises that did not have procedures to identify and reduce the environmental impacts / Number / Serbia (Unit: NR) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Non-innovative enterprises / Enterprises that did not have procedures to identify and reduce the environmental impacts / Percentage / Serbia (Unit: PC) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Non-innovative enterprises / Enterprises that had procedures implemented before 2012 to identify and reduce the environmental impacts / Number / Denmark (Unit: NR) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Non-innovative enterprises / Enterprises that had procedures implemented before 2012 to identify and reduce the environmental impacts / Number / Sweden (Unit: NR) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Non-innovative enterprises / Enterprises that had procedures implemented before 2012 to identify and reduce the environmental impacts / Number / Serbia (Unit: NR) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Non-innovative enterprises / Enterprises that had procedures implemented before 2012 to identify and reduce the environmental impacts / Percentage / Denmark (Unit: PC) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Non-innovative enterprises / Enterprises that had procedures implemented before 2012 to identify and reduce the environmental impacts / Percentage / Serbia (Unit: PC) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Non-innovative enterprises / Enterprises that had procedures implemented between 2012 and 2014 to identify and reduce the environmental impacts / Number / Denmark (Unit: NR) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Non-innovative enterprises / Enterprises that had procedures implemented between 2012 and 2014 to identify and reduce the environmental impacts / Number / Sweden (Unit: NR) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Non-innovative enterprises / Enterprises that had procedures implemented between 2012 and 2014 to identify and reduce the environmental impacts / Number / Serbia (Unit: NR) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Non-innovative enterprises / Enterprises that had procedures implemented between 2012 and 2014 to identify and reduce the environmental impacts / Percentage / Denmark (Unit: PC) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Non-innovative enterprises / Enterprises that had procedures implemented between 2012 and 2014 to identify and reduce the environmental impacts / Percentage / Serbia (Unit: PC) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Entreprises that have introduced an innovation (all types) / Enterprises for which existing environmental regulations were a highly important factor / Number / Sweden (Unit: NR) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Entreprises that have introduced an innovation (all types) / Enterprises for which existing environmental regulations were a highly important factor / Number / Serbia (Unit: NR) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Entreprises that have introduced an innovation (all types) / Enterprises for which existing environmental regulations were a highly important factor / Percentage / Serbia (Unit: PC) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Entreprises that have introduced an innovation (all types) / Enterprises for which existing environmental regulations were not a relevant factor / Number / Denmark (Unit: NR) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Entreprises that have introduced an innovation (all types) / Enterprises for which existing environmental regulations were not a relevant factor / Number / Sweden (Unit: NR) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Entreprises that have introduced an innovation (all types) / Enterprises for which existing environmental regulations were not a relevant factor / Number / Serbia (Unit: NR) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Entreprises that have introduced an innovation (all types) / Enterprises for which existing environmental regulations were not a relevant factor / Percentage / Denmark (Unit: PC) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Entreprises that have introduced an innovation (all types) / Enterprises for which existing environmental regulations were not a relevant factor / Percentage / Serbia (Unit: PC) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Entreprises that have introduced an innovation (all types) / Enterprises for which existing environmental taxes, charges or fees were a highly important factor / Number / Sweden (Unit: NR) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Entreprises that have introduced an innovation (all types) / Enterprises for which existing environmental taxes, charges or fees were a highly important factor / Number / Serbia (Unit: NR) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Entreprises that have introduced an innovation (all types) / Enterprises for which existing environmental taxes, charges or fees were a highly important factor / Percentage / Serbia (Unit: PC) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Entreprises that have introduced an innovation (all types) / Enterprises for which existing environmental taxes, charges or fees were not a relevant factor / Number / Denmark (Unit: NR) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Entreprises that have introduced an innovation (all types) / Enterprises for which existing environmental taxes, charges or fees were not a relevant factor / Number / Sweden (Unit: NR) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Entreprises that have introduced an innovation (all types) / Enterprises for which existing environmental taxes, charges or fees were not a relevant factor / Number / Serbia (Unit: NR) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Entreprises that have introduced an innovation (all types) / Enterprises for which existing environmental taxes, charges or fees were not a relevant factor / Percentage / Denmark (Unit: PC) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Entreprises that have introduced an innovation (all types) / Enterprises for which existing environmental taxes, charges or fees were not a relevant factor / Percentage / Serbia (Unit: PC) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Entreprises that have introduced an innovation (all types) / Enterprises for which environmental regulations or taxes expected in the future were a highly important factor / Number / Sweden (Unit: NR) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Entreprises that have introduced an innovation (all types) / Enterprises for which environmental regulations or taxes expected in the future were a highly important factor / Number / Serbia (Unit: NR) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Entreprises that have introduced an innovation (all types) / Enterprises for which environmental regulations or taxes expected in the future were a highly important factor / Percentage / Serbia (Unit: PC) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Entreprises that have introduced an innovation (all types) / Enterprises for which environmental regulations or taxes expected in the future were not a relevant factor / Number / Denmark (Unit: NR) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Entreprises that have introduced an innovation (all types) / Enterprises for which environmental regulations or taxes expected in the future were not a relevant factor / Number / Sweden (Unit: NR) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Entreprises that have introduced an innovation (all types) / Enterprises for which environmental regulations or taxes expected in the future were not a relevant factor / Number / Serbia (Unit: NR) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Entreprises that have introduced an innovation (all types) / Enterprises for which environmental regulations or taxes expected in the future were not a relevant factor / Percentage / Denmark (Unit: PC) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Entreprises that have introduced an innovation (all types) / Enterprises for which environmental regulations or taxes expected in the future were not a relevant factor / Percentage / Serbia (Unit: PC) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Entreprises that have introduced an innovation (all types) / Enterprises for which Government grants, subsidies or other financial incentives for environmental innovations were a highly important factor / Number / Sweden (Unit: NR) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Entreprises that have introduced an innovation (all types) / Enterprises for which Government grants, subsidies or other financial incentives for environmental innovations were a highly important factor / Number / Serbia (Unit: NR) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Entreprises that have introduced an innovation (all types) / Enterprises for which Government grants, subsidies or other financial incentives for environmental innovations were a highly important factor / Percentage / Serbia (Unit: PC) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Entreprises that have introduced an innovation (all types) / Enterprises for which Government grants, subsidies or other financial incentives for environmental innovations were not a relevant factor / Number / Denmark (Unit: NR) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Entreprises that have introduced an innovation (all types) / Enterprises for which Government grants, subsidies or other financial incentives for environmental innovations were not a relevant factor / Number / Sweden (Unit: NR) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Entreprises that have introduced an innovation (all types) / Enterprises for which Government grants, subsidies or other financial incentives for environmental innovations were not a relevant factor / Number / Serbia (Unit: NR) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Entreprises that have introduced an innovation (all types) / Enterprises for which Government grants, subsidies or other financial incentives for environmental innovations were not a relevant factor / Percentage / Denmark (Unit: PC) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Entreprises that have introduced an innovation (all types) / Enterprises for which Government grants, subsidies or other financial incentives for environmental innovations were not a relevant factor / Percentage / Serbia (Unit: PC) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Entreprises that have introduced an innovation (all types) / Enterprises for which current or expected market demand for environmental innovations was a highly important factor / Number / Sweden (Unit: NR) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Entreprises that have introduced an innovation (all types) / Enterprises for which current or expected market demand for environmental innovations was a highly important factor / Number / Serbia (Unit: NR) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Entreprises that have introduced an innovation (all types) / Enterprises for which current or expected market demand for environmental innovations was a highly important factor / Percentage / Serbia (Unit: PC) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Entreprises that have introduced an innovation (all types) / Enterprises for which current or expected market demand for environmental innovations was not a relevant factor / Number / Denmark (Unit: NR) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Entreprises that have introduced an innovation (all types) / Enterprises for which current or expected market demand for environmental innovations was not a relevant factor / Number / Sweden (Unit: NR) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Entreprises that have introduced an innovation (all types) / Enterprises for which current or expected market demand for environmental innovations was not a relevant factor / Number / Serbia (Unit: NR) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Entreprises that have introduced an innovation (all types) / Enterprises for which current or expected market demand for environmental innovations was not a relevant factor / Percentage / Denmark (Unit: PC) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Entreprises that have introduced an innovation (all types) / Enterprises for which current or expected market demand for environmental innovations was not a relevant factor / Percentage / Serbia (Unit: PC) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Entreprises that have introduced an innovation (all types) / Enterprises for which improving the enterprise's reputation was a highly important factor / Number / Sweden (Unit: NR) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Entreprises that have introduced an innovation (all types) / Enterprises for which improving the enterprise's reputation was a highly important factor / Number / Serbia (Unit: NR) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Entreprises that have introduced an innovation (all types) / Enterprises for which improving the enterprise's reputation was a highly important factor / Percentage / Serbia (Unit: PC) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Entreprises that have introduced an innovation (all types) / Enterprises for which improving the enterprise's reputation was not a relevant factor / Number / Denmark (Unit: NR) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Entreprises that have introduced an innovation (all types) / Enterprises for which improving the enterprise's reputation was not a relevant factor / Number / Sweden (Unit: NR) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Entreprises that have introduced an innovation (all types) / Enterprises for which improving the enterprise's reputation was not a relevant factor / Number / Serbia (Unit: NR) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Entreprises that have introduced an innovation (all types) / Enterprises for which improving the enterprise's reputation was not a relevant factor / Percentage / Denmark (Unit: PC) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Entreprises that have introduced an innovation (all types) / Enterprises for which improving the enterprise's reputation was not a relevant factor / Percentage / Serbia (Unit: PC) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Entreprises that have introduced an innovation (all types) / Enterprises for which voluntary actions or initiatives for environmental good practice within the sector were a highly important factor / Number / Sweden (Unit: NR) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Entreprises that have introduced an innovation (all types) / Enterprises for which voluntary actions or initiatives for environmental good practice within the sector were a highly important factor / Number / Serbia (Unit: NR) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Entreprises that have introduced an innovation (all types) / Enterprises for which voluntary actions or initiatives for environmental good practice within the sector were a highly important factor / Percentage / Serbia (Unit: PC) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Entreprises that have introduced an innovation (all types) / Enterprises for which voluntary actions or initiatives for environmental good practice within the sector were not a relevant factor / Number / Denmark (Unit: NR) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Entreprises that have introduced an innovation (all types) / Enterprises for which voluntary actions or initiatives for environmental good practice within the sector were not a relevant factor / Number / Sweden (Unit: NR) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Entreprises that have introduced an innovation (all types) / Enterprises for which voluntary actions or initiatives for environmental good practice within the sector were not a relevant factor / Number / Serbia (Unit: NR) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Entreprises that have introduced an innovation (all types) / Enterprises for which voluntary actions or initiatives for environmental good practice within the sector were not a relevant factor / Percentage / Denmark (Unit: PC) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Entreprises that have introduced an innovation (all types) / Enterprises for which voluntary actions or initiatives for environmental good practice within the sector were not a relevant factor / Percentage / Serbia (Unit: PC) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Entreprises that have introduced an innovation (all types) / Enterprises for which high cost of energy, water or materials was a highly important factor / Number / Sweden (Unit: NR) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Entreprises that have introduced an innovation (all types) / Enterprises for which high cost of energy, water or materials was a highly important factor / Number / Serbia (Unit: NR) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Entreprises that have introduced an innovation (all types) / Enterprises for which high cost of energy, water or materials was a highly important factor / Percentage / Serbia (Unit: PC) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Entreprises that have introduced an innovation (all types) / Enterprises for which high cost of energy, water or materials was not a relevant factor / Number / Denmark (Unit: NR) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Entreprises that have introduced an innovation (all types) / Enterprises for which high cost of energy, water or materials was not a relevant factor / Number / Sweden (Unit: NR) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Entreprises that have introduced an innovation (all types) / Enterprises for which high cost of energy, water or materials was not a relevant factor / Number / Serbia (Unit: NR) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Entreprises that have introduced an innovation (all types) / Enterprises for which high cost of energy, water or materials was not a relevant factor / Percentage / Denmark (Unit: PC) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Entreprises that have introduced an innovation (all types) / Enterprises for which high cost of energy, water or materials was not a relevant factor / Percentage / Serbia (Unit: PC) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Entreprises that have introduced an innovation (all types) / Enterprises for which the need to meet requirements for public procurement contracts was a highly important factor / Number / Denmark (Unit: NR) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Entreprises that have introduced an innovation (all types) / Enterprises for which the need to meet requirements for public procurement contracts was a highly important factor / Number / Sweden (Unit: NR) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Entreprises that have introduced an innovation (all types) / Enterprises for which the need to meet requirements for public procurement contracts was a highly important factor / Number / Serbia (Unit: NR) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Entreprises that have introduced an innovation (all types) / Enterprises for which the need to meet requirements for public procurement contracts was a highly important factor / Percentage / Denmark (Unit: PC) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Entreprises that have introduced an innovation (all types) / Enterprises for which the need to meet requirements for public procurement contracts was a highly important factor / Percentage / Serbia (Unit: PC) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Entreprises that have introduced an innovation (all types) / Enterprises for which the need to meet requirements for public procurement contracts was not a relevant factor / Number / Sweden (Unit: NR) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Entreprises that have introduced an innovation (all types) / Enterprises for which the need to meet requirements for public procurement contracts was not a relevant factor / Number / Serbia (Unit: NR) |
A | ||
|
Total / Agriculture, forestry and fishing / Entreprises that have introduced an innovation (all types) / Enterprises for which the need to meet requirements for public procurement contracts was not a relevant factor / Percentage / Serbia (Unit: PC) |
A |